FAQ · India Market

How reliable is India CTV measurement and what are the main gaps?

India CTV measurement has four structural gaps every advertiser must understand. First: no cross-platform de-duplication. JioHotstar, YouTube CTV, and SonyLIV each report their own unique devices — there is no independent tool to de-duplicate reach across platforms. Second: SSAI blocks client-side verification. JioHotstar, SonyLIV, and Zee5 all use SSAI, which prevents IAS, DoubleVerify, and MOAT from firing client-side impression pixels. Platform-reported impressions are server-side counts, not independently verified. Third: co-viewing is invisible. Platform impression counts are at device level — the 3–4 co-viewers per India CTV screen are not reflected in standard reporting. Fourth: no unified currency. There is no India CTV equivalent of a GRP for cross-platform comparison.

What is reliable: YouTube CTV supports full third-party verification (IAS, DoubleVerify work). Google Brand Lift provides independent brand impact measurement. Platform-reported VCR and frequency data is operationally reliable for campaign optimisation. BARC's streaming panel provides directional audience estimates. For large campaigns (Rs 50 lakh+), independent brand lift studies from Nielsen or Kantar provide defensible measurement — but cost Rs 10–25 lakh to field.

Full guide

For a complete explanation, read: India CTV measurement in 2025-26: BARC, platform reporting, and the gaps